What is your opinion on LTP studio ?

[dpconnoisseur1]

I am by no means an LTP expert, but with my constant disappointment with other studio I decided to give LTP a try and I was surprisingly pleased. To each its own but I will never be a fan of some of genres that are taking over all AnalVids studio (vomit, prolapse, pissing, facial slapping and spiting, fish hooking a models mouth, stepping on their heads, male ass licking and fingering). I simply want to see a beautiful model intensely fucked by Monster Cocks so that I can enjoy all the multiple penetration position with minimum man ass framed in the scene. So far LTP has delivered on many of my likes while minimizing my dislikes

Likes:

• beautiful models (*** Conny Peyton ***, Daniela Ortiz, Helen Star, Luana Honey, Valery Watson)
• impression that men really enjoy their women counterparts with constant caressing, some kissing and nipple and clit teasing
• big cocks (not Monster Cocks but big enough to see all the action with minimal man ass)
• multiple penetration (my favorite type being DP but hoping for an adoption of No Holes Barred (DP, DA, DV and TP) content )
• no erection issues
• no anchor cocks, as men penetrate together or take turns but just don't lay there while the other male goes crazy in model's ass or pussy
• camera angles for most part attempt to show the sexual action and model's face together

Dislikes:

• some female pissing
• high ticket price for non multiple penetration scenes
• wishing for more Tunnel Vision angles and tightening of framing to reduce man ass distraction. See below:
  IMHO Needs Improvement:IMHO Perfection:

Anyway what do others think about LTP ? I am surprisingly pleased with its content and excitedly look forward to purchasing many more scenes from them. I hope they get a chance to DP Rousse Black, Sophi Holmes, Tiffany Star and also bring back Mila Garcia. Mila still looks great in the BTS footage and I would love to add more of Mila to my 4 scene archive of her
Conny PeytonHelen StarLuana Honey

[SimplyStunning]

I've been confused with the Latin Teens Production and Natasha Teen Production studios and tried to stay loyal to Natasha but may have to give this studio a try.

[Tito1981]

My opinion on LTP is good I wish they have a big black guy like lancelot try to get Lancelot back I like the fact the wetness of those Latina asshole Bruno is good but find a dark guy we can enjoy both guys together like on Nathasha Teen.

[misangrenegra2]

My impression is good.

They bring beautiful latina girls, a kind of girls that had low visibility in the site. They are fiery by nature and are very dedicated

The performance looks great, the content is mainly DP but have a good variety with DA, Anal and DPP.

The latin guys are very dedicated too and show how explosive they are, they good cocks sizes, also they fuck very well the pussies and asses.

Both parts really enjoy the sex, the camera works good and looks more natural.

I surely i will support some scenes from that studio in the future

[zeusanalfreak299]

Pro´s
- Beautiful, cute, fit models.
- Anal loving models
- Intersesting outfits, lingeries
- Beautiful makeup/styling/hair

Con´s
- Unaesthetic and unerotic body positions like in the circus.
- Poor camera lense
- Poor camera angles
- Poor light
- Often limp cocks, although the guys are young
- Only a few big cock
- The models are fucked too wildly and frantically, there is too much improvisation and experimentation

[misangrenegra2]

[quote="zeusanalfreak299"]Pro´s
- Beautiful, cute, fit models.
- Anal loving models
- Intersesting outfits, lingeries
- Beautiful makeup/styling/hair

Con´s
- Unaesthetic and unerotic body positions like in the circus.
- Poor camera lense
- Poor camera angles
- Poor light
- Often limp cocks, although the guys are young
- Only a few big cock
- The models are fucked too wildly and frantically, there is too much improvisation and experimentation[/quote]

Why this is bad? Is one of the good points of the latin male crew, they fuck the girls in a rough and fieryly way offering good hard sex, also they are less mechanics but more natural, the guys are quite energetics and communicative with the girls, something that the girls does too, being something reciprocal between them.

They offer a different style of performance to the male performers in EU, i think is what someone expect for latin people: they are more active, more fierly, more passionate, more alives. They totally transmit those things in their scenes.

[zeusanalfreak299]

Why this is bad? Is one of the good points of the latin male crew, they fuck the girls in a rough and fieryly way offering good hard sex, also they are less mechanics but more natural, the guys are quite energetics and communicative with the girls, something that the girls does too, being something reciprocal between them.

They offer a different style of performance to the male performers in EU, i think is what someone expect for latin people: they are more active, more fierly, more passionate, more alives. They totally transmit those things in their scenes.

Well, I don´t like it. I prefer positions which a common in studios like GIO, Gonzo, SOS Sineplex (in the past), Yummy, etc. Most girls there look more erotic and welcoming.

[xxxVIPERxxx]

LTP studio seem like a studio which is on the up...!

[lachichila2]

My opinion is good, pretty girls, good cocks, they don't abuse lingerie like most places like Giorgio, which I like because I love bare feet. The bad are the camera lens, the angles, the bad lighting and the lack of good photos, of a good photo gallery!

[seedfeeder]

the chicks are great, the woodworkers are mostly pretty solid. Camera work is an area that could need some improvement. I am buying quite a lot of scenes here.

[admin1909]

LTP studio seem like a studio which is on the up...!

[abaco73]

Studio seems quite good, but too often I see during DP/DAP guys not involved jerking instead of using girls' mouth. Please keep them busy!

[dap-addict]

I repost this from the love-LTP thread:

Studs seem slightly better though at LTP compared with similarly Medellin based NTP.
They have less crooked dicks and less wood problems.
Camera seems also better.

They base more on simple solutions like naked girl or heels off to fuck compared to NTP.
It's thus way easier to handle on set, easier to film.
But in both cases pretty clueless cameraman dont help ofc.

IF camera is bad anyway I prefer the more refined dress-up approach of NTP actually.

And let me add that imho they should start dwelling on more refined dress-up or small story or at least garden options instead of dwelling only on sex act variations adding TAP or TP to DAP.
Baseing all only on sex acts filmed always on same couch is getting boring a bit.